Wednesday, October 10, 2012



Interpersonal Aspects of Midlife Marriage: Health
  If you are married at age 50, you want to have good health, right?  It’s common knowledge that there are studies that say if you are married, you probably are in better health and you will live longer. This assumes that the couple helps take care of and watch out for each other. This simplistic assumption holds true only if you have a satisfactory marriage. What if I told you that being married may cause you to have poor health?  Is your spouse a jerk, an alcoholic, a workaholic or just unresponsive to you?  You can bet this causes you additional stress! This stress causes elevated blood pressure and heart rates even in younger adults. If you are in midlife with continual stress, these physical responses are not good.  In long-term, midlife marriages, being married to someone who is uncaring, unhelpful and makes too many demands on you may cause you to develop physical problems, chronic health problems, and even disability. The chronic strain of an unhealthy marital relationship seems to contribute to poor health in midlife individuals.
     I was reading an article in the Journal of Aging and Health (2005).  This article said that many studies on marital quality and health have been done in the past on younger couples in their 30s and 40s. However, this study examined midlife and older couples and, importantly, it differed from previous studies in that it controlled for depression. Depression is often associated with marital dissatisfaction, poor health and poorer self-perceived health ratings. Controlling for depression gave the researcher a better understanding of the quality of the relationship and physical health of the couples. This was a large study of 729 individuals in their first marriage, ages 50 to 74. The study included five dimensions of marital quality (e.g. marital disagreement, positive and negative spousal behaviors, global quality of the relationship and communication) to discover which aspects of marital quality affected health.  The researcher of this study found that negative spousal behaviors (e.g. too many demands, makes you feel tense, argumentative, critical, cannot be relied on, or just getting on your nerves) were the attributes that most consistently brought about poor health in the other spouse. This was a reliable study and easily generalized to midlife married adults because it was a large study, it controlled for depression, and it also broke down aspects of marital quality into five negative and positive characteristics. 
     The results of this study also agreed with previous studies on the negative effect of social exchanges. These prior findings also report that “negative social exchanges are more strongly and reliably associated with well-being than positive social exchanges” (Bookwala, 2005, p. 99). The author then concludes from this that “negative behaviors from one’s spouse outweighs the role of positive spousal behaviors in physical health” (p. 99).
     In another article in the American Journal of Public Health, (2001), they linked SES (socioeconomic status) with health in midlife married couples. The news from this article is even more alarming. The purpose of the study was to see how often both individuals face health problems at the same time and also to check for a link to SES. This report indicated that SES affects the health of both individuals in a marriage. When one falls into poor health, the other spouse has a larger load to carry with medical costs, employment interruptions, and care giving, etc. This often results in both individuals falling into poor health.  When two “unhealthy persons are married to each other, both lack the support a healthy spouse provides, and both face the additional burden of having a disabled partner” (Wilson, 2001 p. 134). Specifically, this study showed a connection between the health of the husband and the health of the wife. A husband with “excellent” health had a 2.3% chance of having a wife with poor health, versus if the man had “poor” health, 13.2% of the wives had poor health also. In relation to socioeconomic levels, “household income was strongly associated with both individual health status and the joint occurrence of poor health within marriage partnerships” (p. 133).  An example from the study was 12.5% of the households in the lowest quintile had both spouses in poor health, versus “0.7% of household in the top quintile” (p 133).  This study also asked about education levels. The marriages with both individuals not having completed a high school education are at highest risk of both being in poor health. With an inadequate education, it is more difficult for health-related decisions to be made and health care services to be assessed.  When the researcher put both education, SES and health together, “approximately half of all couples in which both spouses were in poor health were in the lowest SES categories both income and education” (p. 133).
     There are a few takeaway points from these two articles on midlife marriage.  First, a marriage is a significant interpersonal relationship that affects you across your life span. It is one of the most intimate connections you have and possibly the greatest source of emotional, physical and financial support you will have. Marital happiness can provide so much to the couple, but there are some aspects of marriage that can be damaging. Negative behaviors on the part of a spouse can lead to poor health in the other spouse. Marital therapy can improve not only the marital quality of the relationship, but it can improve the health of the individual. Also, socioeconomic and educational levels of the couple also have a high chance of affecting the health of both individuals. The quality of marriage, along with education and SES are powerful components to having good health later in life.
Bookwala, J. (2005). The role of marital quality in physical health during the mature years. Journal of Aging and Health. 17(1), 85-104.
            doi: 10.1177/0898264304272794
Wilson, S. E., (2001). Socioeconomic status and the prevalence of health problems among married couples in late midlife. American Journal of Public Health. 91(1). 131-135

9 comments:

  1. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Nancy, The assumption that marriage is a direct link to healthier and longer lives is something I always thought was govermental propoganda of population control and manipulation. After reading your blog I still believe this, wink, but am certainly more enlightened on the subject. I get that marriage gives a person intimacy and love (hopefully) and other health benefitting aspects through such a partnership but I believe there are a few more factors involved then simply realting it to the marriage itself. Like for instance, having a comfortable, reliable, dependable and repetitive lifestyle. Also a person in a long-standing marriage may take less chances, have less sexual partners, binge drink less, etc. I have trouble seeing the direct link to marriage specifically.

    I can of course see how negative spousal behaviors can lead to unhealthy aspects of life along with depression and such.

    I thought the second study was interesting but also a bit overwhelming and confusing. You might wanna try breaking the large paragraph up into smaller more thematic ones. I had trouble deciphering what your main points were and how some of them related. But overall, I can tell you worked hard on your reasearch and found your blog very informational.

    I guess I better get married pronto if I want to remain healthy. Good job Mrs. Nancy Hartman!

    ReplyDelete
  4. I found your blog to be very interesting! I have also come across many articles that link overall life quality, as well as stress levels and physical health to the quality of the marriage relationship. I didn’t consider the socio-economic aspect of it though. I wonder if people who are more educated, and make more money simply have better awareness of their physical health, or better healthcare with easier access to good doctors? I also wonder which is the driver. Is being better educated key to lifestyle and self-care, or is money responsible for that? I can think of personal examples that support each idea. Overall it makes sense to me though. If you’re in a positive relationship, receiving the physical, mental, and emotional support from your spouse, you should be a healthier, better-adjusted person, right? If you don’t have all of those positive factors in your life, and in fact they are negative, it would wear you out and bring you down. This just places even more importance on the decision to marry! You want to make sure you marry someone who is going to provide positive experiences, and for whom you can also provide positive experiences and support. Did the study talk at all about whether or not the individuals in the detrimental relationships would have been better off single? I wonder how their health would fare if they decided to leave the negative spouse and venture out on their own.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Nancy,

    Discussing a common knowledge idea like "marriage keeps us healthier longer" is a smart approach to the blog. It is something we have heard often and maybe have not considered the fact that it should be, or needs to be, a healthy relationship. For the blog format - this reads more like a Literature Review than a blog. Imagine you found this interesting information on midlife marriages, and now you want to discuss them with your best friend (who is not a Comm major) how would you translate the information for her/him? You are just "shooting the breeze" about an issue that matters to you - what does that sound like? Make it personal, put some of your related experiences in there. You have great information and a really interesting research question, now just work on finding your "voice" for the blog. Nice job!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for your feedback. I love the compliment on using "common knowledge". I felt like I was almost taking a chance saying that. I'm not used to writing informally. I have done lots of literature reviews and have gotten fairly good with citations. One of my prior professors (who I had twice) was a stickler for .,)spaces, etc. Ok, I'll try to get more casual and interpersonal. Thanks Christine.

      Delete
  6. Thanks Mike for your reply. The articles I read did not presume to say that marital quality was the only link to health. The authors were only reporting that it is not just that an individual is married that may promote a more healthy life, which is what many earlier studies reported, but the quality of that relationship plays a huge part. The study measured four indicators of physical health, along with five indicators of marital quality. The four indicators of physical health were significantly affected by the specific indicator of negative spousal behaviors. There was a definite correspondence between those two measures.

    Also, the second article had nothing to do with marital quality, but SES and the health of the couple. When you have a spouse, they are the first person to be there to help you when you are ill. But, in addition to that, if you are in the lower SES, this spouse’s illness can put added burden on you financially, physically & emotionally. Possibly if you are in the lower SES, you have less education, which makes it harder to navigate and understand the health care system. You probably don’t even have health insurance! This puts an enormous strain on the care giving spouse, which often leads to both having poor health. The article said that married couples having a lower SES and no high school education were at greatest probability of both of them being in poor health.

    The takeaway: to have a better chance of having good health, have a good quality marriage and get an education so you are not poor!

    ReplyDelete
  7. Charlotte, thank you for your reply. Deciding who to marry is THE most important decision a person makes in a lifetime. I think there needs to be instruction on the magnitude of the decision. Maybe we’d have fewer divorces if people really knew what they were getting into. The articles did not say anything about making the decision to be single. It just dealt with married midlife couples.

    I agree with you that people who make more money (and are probably more educated), are more aware of and have access to better health opportunities like health clubs, hobbies that give physical exercise and health insurance. The article from the American Journal of Public Health said that people who are undereducated are at a disadvantage in understanding and utilizing health care choices.

    You made a great point. What drives this scenario? Does poor health bring about lower income, or does the lower income bring about poor health? The article mentioned that “poor health is both a cause and a consequence of low SES” (p. 131). However, this study looked at specifically how often both individuals are in poor health and to link that with SES categories.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Hi there, Nancy! A few comments for you. First, I just love that you are focusing on midlife, and that you are actually finding some good articles despite the fact that many researchers, as you noted, tend to study younger populations. As our country is aging and people are living longer, looking at these variables in middle age is crucial. Second, I found myself very sad reading about the correlation between SES and poor health, and that one spouses health ends up affecting the others. Put together, it just seems quite unfair. When you start to feel like an "expert" as a result of your studying I'd love to see you get a bit more assertive in your blog in terms of offering advice to people.

    ReplyDelete